Mufasa: The Lion King hit theaters as a prequel to the highly popular 2019 live-action remake of The Lion King. The recently released film not only promises to achieve success comparable to its predecessor but also raises questions about the originality of recent releases and the choices available to audiences.
A massive hit. The Lion King had a budget of around $260 million and grossed approximately $1.7 billion worldwide. These impressive figures make it the 10th highest-grossing film in history. For comparison, Beauty and the Beast ranks 25th, with a gross of $1.3 billion.
Roaring expectations. Naturally, Mufasa aspires to match or at least come close to those impressive figures. The new film is projected to have a strong opening weekend, with forecasts estimating a gross of $66 million in the U.S. alone. This places it in a favorable position and is a better outlook than its main competitor, Sonic the Hedgehog 3, which is expected to gross around $50 million in its first weekend.
More of the same. However, Mufasa is yet another example of a common trend in recent times. The 10 highest-grossing films of the year have all been sequels, with one exception: Wicked, which isn’t strictly a sequel but also not an original production. While it remains to be seen if Mufasa can break into that top tier, it clearly reflects an undeniable trend: Audiences are less inclined to see original content.
Time to reflect. Hollywood needs to examine its own productions and confront this issue. It’s a real problem: Relying on past successes without fostering new ones can lead to negative consequences. Fresh ideas are essential for revitalizing audiences and narratives. To put it another way: How long can adults who enjoyed the original Disney films as children continue to take their kids to see new versions of those classics? How many different stories can the Sonic franchise, which has just confirmed a fourth installment, tell before it becomes evident that the character has limited narratives to offer?
The convoluted path to a sequel. To grasp the extent of Hollywood’s derivative situation, you only need to consider the true nature of Mufasa. It serves as a prequel to a film that isn’t original but rather a live-action remake of a 1994 animated feature. Additionally, Mufasa isn’t strictly a prequel. It also includes scenes that occur after the original film. This results in a hodgepodge of timelines that fails to provide what’s desperately needed in current mainstream cinema: a breath of fresh air.
Image | Disney
Related | Hollywood’s Habit of Splitting Movies in Two Strikes Again With Wicked
View 0 comments